As one might expect after writing repeatedly about my streak being more than a year with daily Duolingo exercises, it did not take many days before I skipped a day. (I decided to not do any exercises until late in the evening, then slept through that.)
Duolingo helpfully offered to sell me a streak repair for a noticeable amount of real money. (Around $20 – I am not sure if that was exact since the price was quoted in my country’s currency, Norwegian Kroner. But it was pretty close at least.)
Now that we don’t get huge amounts of lingots every 10 days for a successful streak – actually we don’t get any lingots for streaks at all except possibly for a 1-year streak, as mentioned before – there is zero reason to shell out real money for this. Well, if you have friends you compete with, I suppose you could try to trick them into believing you had not forgotten that day, but that would not even be ethical, even if it worked.
Actually, with the vast fortune of lingots that I have, and them being nearly useless, there was no reason to pay real money in the first place. I did it once before to support Duolingo, but now that I subscribe on a monthly basis I have no interest in giving them more. Quite the opposite. It is quite overpriced compared to other online services I have subscribed to. Google Play Music, with literally millions of songs, costs less. Netflix costs more after the recent price hike; it is also too expensive for common people now. Luckily I am single and fully employed in one of the world’s richest countries, so I can afford to waste a bit of money on supporting good ideas I don’t want to see fail for lack of money. But Duolingo is not actually worth paying that much for, and I can’t shake the feeling that they would probably have three times as many subscribers if they halved the price. But for all I know, they may have done science to it and found out that only idealists pay for these things anyway.